Press Release Responding to MPS SAS Report
Author Challenges Scotland Yard to “Come Clean” on its Princess Diana “Scoping” Investigation
Prominent conspiracy author John Morgan has stated that the latest Scotland Yard report into the SAS role in the death of Princess Diana is seriously deficient and completely inadequate.
17 December 2013 - Brisbane, Australia
John Morgan, who is viewed by many as the world’s leading expert on the death of Princess Diana, stated this morning that the latest police report issued yesterday is much more significant for what it does not say, than what it does say.
Speaking from his home in Brisbane, Morgan said that the report was severely deficient: “There is no quote of the allegation made by Soldier N – a person reading this report is given no specific information on the allegation. Yet this is what the scoping exercise was all about. There is also nothing at all about who was interviewed during the four months of scoping and again nothing at all about what the witnesses said.
“So the police have publicly released a report about a four month investigation employing 7 officers full time – all publicly funded. Yet they have not included in it: a) the original allegation that led to the investigation being launched; b) the identities or even the roles of any witnesses interviewed; or c) any information about what the witnesses told the police.”
Morgan went on to say: “Effectively the document produced by Scotland Yard is useless and I feel that the police are treating the public like fools. Do they really think that people will accept this three page document as the final word on the SAS claims?
“There is a massive public interest factor here. It is in the public interest for the MPS to come clean with a thorough report on the witness and documentary evidence they have. But this is not what is happening at all. Instead they have produced what I call a ‘nothing’ document – it tells the public nothing. A person who reads their report is no wiser at the end than they were before they picked it up.
“This raises the question: Why have the police done this? Do they have something to hide? If they don’t, then why can’t they be honest with the British people?”
John Morgan has written nine books on the 31 August 1997 crash in Paris that took the lives of Britain’s dearly-loved Princess Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed. Eminent QC Michael Mansfield – who served throughout the six months of the London inquest – has said: “I have no doubt that the volumes written by John Morgan will come to be regarded as the ‘Magnum Opus’ on the crash”.
Mohamed Al Fayed, who lost his son Dodi in the Paris crash, has stated: “I believe that John Morgan has done more to expose the facts of this case than the police in France and Britain.”
17 December 2013 - Brisbane, Australia
John Morgan, who is viewed by many as the world’s leading expert on the death of Princess Diana, stated this morning that the latest police report issued yesterday is much more significant for what it does not say, than what it does say.
Speaking from his home in Brisbane, Morgan said that the report was severely deficient: “There is no quote of the allegation made by Soldier N – a person reading this report is given no specific information on the allegation. Yet this is what the scoping exercise was all about. There is also nothing at all about who was interviewed during the four months of scoping and again nothing at all about what the witnesses said.
“So the police have publicly released a report about a four month investigation employing 7 officers full time – all publicly funded. Yet they have not included in it: a) the original allegation that led to the investigation being launched; b) the identities or even the roles of any witnesses interviewed; or c) any information about what the witnesses told the police.”
Morgan went on to say: “Effectively the document produced by Scotland Yard is useless and I feel that the police are treating the public like fools. Do they really think that people will accept this three page document as the final word on the SAS claims?
“There is a massive public interest factor here. It is in the public interest for the MPS to come clean with a thorough report on the witness and documentary evidence they have. But this is not what is happening at all. Instead they have produced what I call a ‘nothing’ document – it tells the public nothing. A person who reads their report is no wiser at the end than they were before they picked it up.
“This raises the question: Why have the police done this? Do they have something to hide? If they don’t, then why can’t they be honest with the British people?”
John Morgan has written nine books on the 31 August 1997 crash in Paris that took the lives of Britain’s dearly-loved Princess Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed. Eminent QC Michael Mansfield – who served throughout the six months of the London inquest – has said: “I have no doubt that the volumes written by John Morgan will come to be regarded as the ‘Magnum Opus’ on the crash”.
Mohamed Al Fayed, who lost his son Dodi in the Paris crash, has stated: “I believe that John Morgan has done more to expose the facts of this case than the police in France and Britain.”